WTO -- opportunities and uncertainties
The government response to withdrawal of Generalised
Preference System by EU for Pakistani exports leaves much to be desired
By Andleeb Abbas
The Export Promotion
bureau ran a thought provoking media campaign at the beginning of this year.
The theme of this campaign was to reassure exporters that WTO (World Trade
Organisation) is not going to have an adverse impact on their trade and would
in fact provide many opportunities as quotas will disappear. Let us hope that
this claim proves true as the year ended at a rather disappointing note for
exporters.
Trade deficit
2004 ended with trade
issues taking a rather unfavourable turn; while exports went down, imports rose
substantially causing the trade deficit to rise.
Pakistan's export of
textile manufactures declined by 13.7 per cent to $606.871 million in December
2004 as against $703.180 million in the same month in 2003.
Official figures released
here last Saturday by Federal Bureau of Statistics showed that export of cotton
yarn declined by 34.74 per cent, cloth by 19.86 per cent, knitwear by 4.60 per
cent, readymade garments by 12.67 per cent, tents, canvas and tarpaulin by
53.50 per cent and art, silk and synthetic textile by 23.46 per cent during December
2004 against the figures for same month in 2003.
The value of total
textile manufactures during the first half year of the current fiscal year
declined by 2.50 per cent to $3.736 billion compared to $3.831 billion in the
same period of the last fiscal year.
Further data on textile
manufactures showed that export of cotton yarn declined by 13.37 per cent, bed
wear by 23.01 per cent, readymade garments by 20.30 per cent, tents, canvas and
tarpaulin by 46 per cent and art, silk and synthetic textile by 45.55 per cent
during July-December 2004 against the figures for the same period in 2003. The
export figures further revealed that export of cotton cloth, knitwear, towels
and made-up articles registered growth during the period under review over the
corresponding period of the last year. The export of cotton increased by 2.24
per cent, knitwear by 41.32 per cent, towels by 20.19 per cent and made-up
articles by 13.01 per cent during the first six months of the current fiscal
year over the same period last fiscal year.
On the other hand,
massive growth in imports of four categories of items during the first half
(July-December) of the current fiscal year increased the trade deficit by
233.07 per cent to $2.409 billion as against $00723 Billion over the same period
of the last fiscal year.
The official figures
showed that import of metal group increased by 49.16 per cent, of petroleum
group by 37.92 per cent, of agricultural and other chemicals group by 37.49 per
cent, of machinery group by 33.59 per cent, textile group by 24.79 per cent and
food group by 17.15 per cent (July-December) of the current fiscal year over
the same period last fiscal year.
The statistics showed
that the import of iron and steel scrap increased by 79.41 per cent, iron and
steel by 48.86 per cent and wrought aluminium by 13.10 per cent during the
period under review. In the petroleum group, the import of petroleum crude
increase by 34.80 per cent and petroleum products by 40.40 per cent during the
July-December period of the current fiscal year against what they were in the
same period last fiscal year.
In the agriculture and
other chemical group, import of manufactured fertilizer rose by 29.49 per cent,
insecticide by 48.13 per cent and plastic materials by 49.69 per cent. However,
import of medicinal products declined by 5.51 per cent during the period under
review over the same period of last fiscal year.
The increase in the
import of machinery group was attributed to a significant rise in the import of
textile, construction and mining machinery. The import of textile machinery
rose by 69.93 per cent, construction and mining machinery by 42.08 per cent,
agriculture machinery and implements by 66.90 per cent, office machine
including data processing equipment by 11.27 per cent and power generation
machinery by 19.44 per cent during the months under review.
The beginning of the
WTO era
The actual impact of the
free quota regime on Pakistan's exportable products will be assessed during the
next few months particularly in the garment sector. Though the quotas have been
removed, many other subsidies and concessions which the Pakistani industry was
enjoying, are also going to disappear. Unfortunately the industry is not
prepared for this.
Price war in post-quota
free regime has already started pinching Pakistani textile sector. Prices and
production have fallen down by 12 and 25 per cent respectively for the first
month after removal of Genera1ised System of Preferences (GSP). The GSP, offered
by the European Union to Pakistan, has been suspended from 1st January after
Pakistan ceased to qualify for it because its exports to EU exceeded one per
cent. Pakistan share of EU clothing imports has reached 1.7 per cent at
present. Therefore it is no more entitled to GSP. Reports are suggesting that
Pakistan will have to wait for another five months to avail GSP Plus, another
European Union trade regime.
"About 70 per cent
garments factories are reporting under utilisation," said Muhammad Naseer
Malik, former Chairman Pakistan Readymade Garments Manufacturers &
Exporters Association (PRGMEA) North. He added that the initial estimates
showed that the utilisation had come down to 65 to 70 per cent from 90 per
cent. The price factor has actually crippled the garments industry particularly
because of the removal of GSP, he further said. According to him, buyers are
not ready to absorb the blow of 12.5 per cent duty that has made Pakistani
products uncompetitive in the EU. The duty was restored by the EU for
Pakistan's clothing shipments with the withdrawal of GSP from 1st January 2005
and majority of the buyers are now shifting orders to Bangladesh (declared as
the Least Developed Country) because of duty fee entry of its consignments to
the EU. According to some estimates, order placing for Pakistani garments has
reduced by 25 to 30 per cent by February.
The total number of
machines installed in different readymade garments units in Pakistan is around
450,000, according to the Secretary PRGMEA, an organisation which has around
1200 members. The industry sources believe that most of the garment units will
have to face tough times in coming months, as it happened earlier in case of
knitwear after 9/1I due to the price factor.
Most of the unit-holders
have started compromising on their profits simply to protect their contacts in
the EU market. According to them, the profit margins have come down to 6 to 7
per cent, which are not enough to bear the day-to-day production cost. They are
supposed to pay from their own pockets in most of the cases. Meanwhile, a
number of the exporters now feel that they have to focus on other markets
around the world if they have to survive.
Actions and Reactions
Unfortunately the stance
of both exporters and government has as usual not been timely. While the
exporters are constantly seeking government support, the government is still
not fully understanding the complexity of the situation. Subsidies are being
planned and other incentives sought, but is that enough to sustain the industry
in the face of the increasingly open competition they are likely to face in the
coming years when more and more cheaper sources of supplies will be available
to foreign buyer?
Every trade policy is
announced with heavy claims of addressing these issues. A lot of grand
initiatives are announced in every policy, with little follow up or action on
most of them. Almost 50 per cent of announcements made in the trade policy of
2003-04 still require action while those announced in 2004-2005 policy are barely
touched. Serious initiatives like technology upgradation and marketing of
Pakistani products are the prime casualties. The ministry of commerce says that
its job is to make policies while it is the job of Export Promotion Bureau
(EPB) to implement them. EPB meanwhile blames the ministry for making the
procedures too cumbersome for speedy implementation to be possible.
The problem seems to stem
from the fact that no one seems to still comprehend and understand the exact
impact of the post-WTO scenario on trade. It is hard to fathom why the expected
withdrawal of GSP status was not taken care of and transition from it not
planned much earlier. The EPB instead of celebrating the withdrawal of quotas
should have made an awareness campaign for exporters warning them that since
Pakistan's share of textile exports was exceeding one per cent it was time for
them to search for other markets. Ideally EPB should have facilitated the
exporters to find other markets and made them less dependent on EU.
Unfortunately the whole industry has been thrown into a panic due to negligence
of the concerned authorities and the lack of knowledge of the exporters
themselves. As the exporter is pushed back to the wall he has no option but to
lower his price and suffer declining profits.
Textiles are not the only
suffering export. Rice is another of our main export that has suffered a big
setback as the export of its Irri-6 variety is losing its main market in Kenya.
The duty structure has been revised by the Kenyan government and has been
increased from 35 per cent to 70 per cent, making Pakistani rice exports to
that country uncompetitive. Government's reaction has followed the usual chain
of denial, reaction and little action.
The government has not
done any impacts study and thus is taking things as they come. It is imperative
that the government initiate a study on the major political and legal risks the
country's exports face in the major markets.
It should hire
professionals to do an in depth study on the market reactions of the major
importing countries. This should include a study of the country's trade
policies, especially towards our major exporting items. The study can have
following ingredients:
I The study should cover
not only trade barriers but non-trade barriers as well which Pakistan is likely
to face in the next five years.
II It should suggest
alternative actions for negotiating with export markets and underscore other
legal and marketing measures for safeguarding the risks of losing these
markets.
III On the basis of these
findings the government should carry out awareness campaigns to prepare
exporters for the market reactions of their buyers well in time and facilitate
them in preparing alternative strategies.
This approach is based on
the premise that it is never too late. In fact, it is high time that instead of
holding general purpose seminars on WTO, a more specialised and detailed
approach is finally be adopted to stop crying wolf after the damage has been
done.
A proactive approach is
the only way of facing an increasingly competitive global world where
uncertainty is the only certainty in forecasting trading trends.