Come one, Come All

 

By Adam Dunn

 

This is the second part of a series on taxi drivers in New York by columnist Adam Dunn.

 

They came from around the boroughs and the world, grumbling in a rich throaty broth of Spanish, Urdu, Hindi, and English.They carried laser-printed signs that read tlc=torturing local cabbies. Or gps: genuine persecution system. Or look kids, it’s matthew daus [the chairman of the Taxi and Limousine Commission, or TLC], the lying king. They were drivers and they were labor organizers. But they were all members of the New York Taxi Workers Alliance (NYTWA), a de facto union of yellow taxicab drivers over six thousand strong, and they all had a message for the TLC, in front of which they gathered: fuel surcharge yes, GPS no!

 

With energy prices spiking all over the country, businesses dependent upon gasoline have had to impose surcharges on their fares to offset the rising expense of fuel. (This morning, New York Waterway became the latest to join the surcharge ranks, raising prices on some of its routes from $5.75 to $7.75.) The TLC, however, has so far refused to approve a gas surcharge, for which it has been petitioned by both the NYTWA and the League of Mutual Taxi Owners (LOMTO). Other cities around the country, including Chicago, Philadelphia, and Washington, D.C. have approved fuel surcharges for their taxi fleets.

 

The surcharge requested by the NYTWA is very specific. “If the price of gasoline is between two and three dollars, the surcharge is fifty cents [per fare]”, said Alliance organizer Kevin Fitzpatrick. “Between three and four dollars, it would be a dollar. Between four and five dollars, it’s a dollar-fifty. We actually worked this out through six dollars, [although] I don’t think that’s going to happen anytime soon, [but] I would not be surprised if gasoline was three-fifty or four dollars a gallon in another year or two.”

 

Fitzpatrick was speaking from the shady western end of Rector Street, where number 40 marks the headquarters of the TLC. Dozens of drivers rallied around the NYTWA’s director, Bhairavi Desai, who stood opposite the TLC’s building speaking to a growing crowd of reporters (few TLC personnel appeared for smokebreaks behind the police cordon). “GPS has the ability to produce automatic tickets, because it can monitor the speed of a vehicle, similar to the way EZPass has been used in New Jersey,” she said. “Also, they [the TLC] are attaching the GPS to the trip sheet. So you’re supposed to report if a passenger beats your fare [jumping out without paying]. You’re supposed to report that you never collected that amount on the meter, and you’re supposed to go to the police to file a report for theft of services. Now, they’re going to be able to automatically track you. If you don’t report, this could result in an automatic summons.

 

“Or, for example, a passenger gets out at 28th and Madison, and says, ‘This driver was rude to me.’ The TLC will use GPS to check all the medallions in that vicinity. If there’s 20-30 of them, will they all get a summons to go to court? The TLC has already said it would use GPS reports in court, and in investigations. They will also turn the information over to other agencies if subpoenaed, such as the IRS or NYPD. Drivers are not convicted criminals, yet they’re being treated that way by the TLC.” 

 

The GPS (which stands for Global Positioning System, a formerly military satellite tracking technology now widely used by the public, especially in cars), would cost $3K to install, as well as a monthly maintenance charge of $125-$175, all of which would be borne by the drivers. The TLC maintains it would be used to send traffic alerts to drivers, as well as providing a way to track property lost in taxicabs or if a cab is stolen. The NYTWA has angrily opposed such claims as false, saying Lo-Jack technology is already standard on taxicabs (in case one is stolen), all cabs are radio-equipped (so drivers can monitor traffic conditions), and, most importantly, the GPS applied to taxicabs will not provide onboard navigational information.

 

Desai also pointed out that the vendors with whom the TLC apparently has been contracting with for GPS equipment and installation have not been disclosed to the industry or the public. “Which companies,” she speculated, “and which politicians stand to benefit?”

 

Drivers on site grumpily agreed, citing failed past additions to taxis such as the pre-recorded celebrity greetings, which proved famously annoying to both passengers and drivers (although drivers shouldered the cost of both installation and removal of this reviled feature). “We can’t afford one more experiment,” said Desai of the TLC’s GPS campaign.

 

“They’re not going to come out and say, ‘We’re going to use it to track how much you’re making, and track your whereabouts all day.’ They keep denying it, but they’ve found no justifiable reason for why GPS is necessary. It seems to me that they feel more beholden to corporations that they’re working a deal out with, rather than to the 40,000 workers who labor in this industry.”