![]()
New Chairman For PCB?
Dr Nasim is a brave man. It is nice to see that in spite of
oceanic criticism pouring in daily, he has somewhat perfected the art of
running with the hares and hunting with the hounds
By Dr Nauman Niaz
The onslaught and the fallout of Dr Nasim Ashraf's tenure continue to
reverberate with growing intensity. Days on, things simply are not cooling
down. But, ironically, things are calm with the decision makers. Why couldn't
people understand that cricket management is a specialised
subject? The manner in which people from all jobs, be it a retired Lieutenant
General or a Foreign Secretary or a less fanciful Chairman National Commission
for Human Development has exploded cricket management's invincibility is so
tragic. Dr Nasim surprised quite a few when he was
promptly named to replace Shaharyar M Khan.
In England in August 2006, when Inzamam-ul-Haq
conceded the final Test of the series at The Oval after Darrell Hair had
questioned the integrity of the Pakistan players, rightly or wrongly Dr Nasim's actions with the 'thumbs down' showed that he was
under control. Retrospectively, it seems it was just a gesticulation. He wasn't
in control. Neither has the weather been much use to Nasim's
government.
Dr Nasim was one of Shaharyar's several members on the board of governors.
There are reports, though unconfirmed, that he was eager to get into the
position of power, to some considering that cricket's razzmatazz could bring
him into a space from he could emulate Shaukat Aziz to country's highest office.
At one time, his name flashed on the television
screens as one of the choices to hold an interim office before the February
18th General Elections. Who could imagine,
Regrettably, Dr Nasim's
plans were smacked down to impossibility once a coalition government took
office. Now, his survival is being connected to President General Pervez Musharraf's future as the
head of the state. As pictures on television, from the fifth and last One-day
International between
His smiles are not going to change the situation.
He has failed to brave the midday sun rudely waking up all the ghosts of
maddening cricket management. People rallied around, in daunting numbers, at
every dusty, sun baked road he could possibly think of. His choice of men to
run cricket in
The glare of cricket's massive crisis is still
blinding but Dr Nasim is a brave man. It is nice to
see that in spite of oceanic criticism pouring in daily, he has somewhat
perfected the art of running with the hares and hunting with the hounds -- and
if necessary, running with the hounds and hunting with the hares, has
tenaciously declared, on numerous occasions that his policies were a great
success. Most in Dr Nasim's management team have been
men, supping up with the imps and praying with the saints.
Dr Nasim took over the
country's cricket in October 2006 and opened with great bravado but
subsequently skirmishes with reality and the intriguingly complex cricket
politics, he lost his footing. Once he triggered implementation of the now
extremely controversial 'Corporate' culture he thought, as it showed from the
rhetoric, his statues could be erected in every square, in the business houses
and on top of the stadiums.
From the team to employments, central contracts,
appointment of captain, coach, players defecting to the Indian Cricket League,
power-brokerage and supply of top stars to the Indian Premier League and more
than a million dollar development plans, everything seemed inflated like a
balloon and zero performance showed it deflated too.
In spite of great sounds reverberating in newspaper
columns, on television channels, even in the Senate, other than that, there is
a deafening silence from the hundreds of powerful management players, advisors,
special assistants, consultants and flunkeys who have been flattening their
middles with huge salaries and unlimited perks. By my inaccurate reckoning, if
these worthies had bestirred themselves to come to the rescue of their falling
chairman, the newspapers would have been awash with their statements exhorting
to people to strengthen their regime and particularly Dr Nasim
Ashraf.
Instead, they have simply disappeared into the
woodwork of their plush office settings. Only Dr Nasim
tried to make regular appearances and seemed gutted defending the indefensible.
Dr Nasim had a proper
work-space with the blessings of the Patron of the PCB unending he could have
tried giving country's cricket newer dimensions, introducing latest sports
management modules. Instead he picked shreds from the previous regimes, and
used new wrappers to tell the world that fresh stock was being developed.
Dr Nasim in spite of
being given indicators and reasons to sack quite a few in his handpicked
cabinet never bothered to listen to advice. He wanted to shoot people down,
those tried to stand-up to his mindset. If nothing else, directors and senior
managers could be threatened that should they fail to deliver the goods, they
could be shown the door. It wasn't like that, presumably because the chairman
had read their dossiers and known the sad part of their inabilities.
And finally, with new political heads in place, I
am afraid that the game of cricket, on the sunnier climes, is about to receive
a deluge of new management fresh from the pastures. That wouldn't do much for
the game I am afraid. Incompetence shouldn't be replaced with incompetence.
Failures shouldn't be reinforced again.
There are dozens of stories emanating out of
I am his great admirer. How he would be able to
edge out Dr Zafar Altaf
near the finish line is still a bit of mystery. Overall, both are great guys. Saleem, a little more Lahori in
his tone and tenor and a bit more accessible while Zafar
more detailed and philosophical. At the end of the day, it isn't about who wins
the race, it's about how would they be able to pick up their work-teams.
There are stories not couched in fiction but
steeped in facts and they are all about the seizure of their beloved sport by
governments of intolerance, bigotry, and ineptness. If that alone is not deadly
enough, there is the added complication of cricket being stuck in the primeval
mode of governance in
Most of the governments since 1999 have managed it
like a roulette, people flailing about in dead-space, a sullen silence amidst
loud rhetoric punctuated by non-technocrats. One like the current regime have
tried to pursue their own agendas, whereas incapable continue to add even more
to the steamy cauldron.
There are political divides here, intellectual
differences, feuds within, no restoration of game's honour
and transactions going sour. It is just a shambles -- regrettably it doesn't
matter. The future of
It matters least how noble Dr Nasim's
mission may have been. Dr Nasim in the middle of his
tenure as Chairman PCB failed to realise that in
The ordinary people are shell-shocked. They have no
solutions. They have no say in what is going on and they know that they can
only pray that cricket is put back to progression. This is a sad and a
frighteningly chilling thought and there is one more. The present state of
chaos cannot last either. One shudders to think what lies ahead. Time has come that
a proper sports management government is put in place. And may not include
names from the long list of cricket's glitterati, rather it should go to people
really at work, familiar with methods and means to understand game's management
with reference to the triad of Operations, Marketing & Administration. And
it's not only the triad, there is another integral component, and that is the
'intellectual honesty'.
What to do? We have to implement a) THE LIBERAL
MODEL -- sports management is about fulfilling the goals. The Liberal Model
asks about the sports management experts' goals and aspirations to prescribe
policies that will help the team to make end-points reachable.
Then there is b) THE NORMATIVE MODEL -- sports
management is a physical challenge performed within the context of
rule-governed practices. Consequently, sports management time zones are
something that hinders the management players from meeting the challenges and
excelling according to the rules of the games; c) THE PHENOMENAL MODEL -- Sports
Management Challenges are limiting.
Whosoever comes in next, or Dr Nasim
survives (which is most unlikely), its time resource is exhausted in a)
Character Development, b) Program Development and c) High Management
Methodologies including feed-back loops.
We have to stop the existing euthanasia. Cricket
needs reconciliation. There is a desperate need for a 'Chairman PCB' -- Enough
of these 'Chairing' or 'Cheering' men, please. Have a heart and have some
mercy!
Courtesy: The News