Here’s an excerpt of the question:

 

Is it true that while NRI firms such as India Uncut of USA, Sepia Mutiny of Britain and AnarCap Lib of Netherlands have been allowed to invest in Indian SSIs, the reputed German investment firm Desipundit has been denied permission? If so, the reasons thereof? Is the Union Government of India planning to make automatic the long procedure of permission for SSIs to import new technologies such as Trackbacks, Pingbacks, Blogrolls, Splogs and Hitcounters?

 

While nearly all the questions had a public interest element in them, some, like the one above, were passed on to the MPs with the intention of showing how easy it was for amateur teams to infiltrate the system and get bogus questions submitted in the balloting process. While, in this case, these were harmless, humour inducing efforts, in the hands of powerful lobbies this power acquires a sinister dimension. It is important to note some MPs like Kushwaha, Ram Pal and Gandhi even promised to put in questions “to harass” NISMA’s enemies.

 

Ramsevak Singh “Babuji”

 

On May 25 the COBRAPOST team met the Congress MP from Gwalior for the first time. Middleman Vijay arranged the meeting at the MP’s house in North Avenue.

 

Before the meeting with Ramsevak Singh, Vijay tells the NISMA representative not to give any money to the MP directly but route it through him instead. After the pleasantries questions are read out to the legislator. The reporter could not talk anything about money in the meeting as there was another person present in the room. However, the reporter indicates to the MP that she is leaving a packet behind with Vijay, who throughout the meeting was a silent spectator. At the end of the meeting, Vijay is handed over a packet containing Rs 25,000 to be given to the MP. He goes back into the MPs house and returns telling us that the money has been delivered to the MP. He also collects Rs 10,000, as his commission. The reporter also calls up Ramsevak, later the same day, where he confirms receiving Rs 25,000 from Vijay. In another phone conversation on July 29 the MP informs the reporter that he has submitted the questions in the Parliament.

 

The COBRAPOST team goes to meet Ramsevak Singh the second time on August 16. His personal assistant Ravinder Sehrawat was also there along with another person, who was sitting on the sofa beside the MP. Since the question given to Ramsevak did not figure either in the starred or unstarred lists, the MP volunteers to submit them again in the Lok Sabha. He also instructs the NISMA representative to contact him directly henceforth and not come through the middleman, Vijay, who had brought her to him earlier.

 

In the third meeting with the MP on October 7 the reporter reads out a fresh set of questions for submission during the winter session. After Ramsevak assures her that he will submit them in the Parliament in the coming session, the reporter pays him an advance of Rs 10,000. In this meeting the legislator again confirms having received Rs 25,000 from Vijay in the first meeting. Interestingly, in this interaction, a katha (story) on the Ramayana by Ram Kinker is blaring in the room.

 

We meet Ramsevak Singh two more times on November 10. In the first of the two meetings the MP accepts Rs 10,000 from us. The reporter also offers him a monthly retainer for raising questions in the Parliament to which Ramsevak tells us that we can give anything which is profitable to him. Says he: “Nahi figure khud bataa dena soch ke (You tell me the figure yourself after thinking).” In the second meeting he accepts another Rs 5,000, which took the total tally of the money he received from us for submitting questions in the winter session to Rs 25,000. His secretary Ravinder, later, delivers copies of the question forms submitted by the MP in the Lok Sabha on NISMA’s behalf.

 

It will be pertinent to note that the case studies of the 11 MPs above are a condensed version of what exactly transpired and cannot be construed in any way to be the entire gamut of facts. There are many hours of tapes that hold much more interesting material.

 

 

Hidden cameras and politicians are an incompatible, though entertaining, combination. Sucking the air for video, the cameras can acquire evangelical powers. By simply amalgamating sounds and images into facts they can etch the spiritual poverty of Indian politics. They can also furnish the nation with the itinerary of graft: how some Members of Parliament after having come to power use it to convert every due privilege into the all consummate act of making money.

 

Strikingly, according to an estimate by Transparency International India (TII) in June 2005, ordinary Indians paid Rs 21,068 crore as bribes while availing one or more of 11 public services in a year. These are: police (crime/traffic), judiciary, land administration, municipal services, government-run hospitals, electricity supply, public distribution system, income tax, water supply, schools and rural financial institutions—in that order.

With 14405 respondents this survey by TI India was one of the biggest corruption studies in India. While India ranks 88th on the corruption index listing 158 countries, Jammu and Kashmir and Bihar are the most corrupt states in India and Delhi is ranked higher than Uttar Pradesh when it comes to corruption.

 

The report relates just to petty corruption and is not about large scale corruption where public funds are siphoned off as NPAs, or where commissions line the pockets of politicians in defence deals. There are also some reports that suggest that eliminating or minimising corruption would boost India’s GDP by 1.5 per cent.

 

In India, it’s become almost analgesic to talk about the prevalence of corruption. It’s a “given” assumption. There’s even a cynicism developing towards stories of corruption bred more by the attitude “tell us something new”. That is a dangerous trend. For when corruption stories stop burning holes even in the notebook of reporters then it means that there is a lack of outrage over the issue. And an absence of fury will only exacerbate the political bankruptcy that the nation finds itself in. While we should never be so consumed by the passion to expose that we sacrifice responsibility and accuracy, at the same time we should guard against losing that passion.

 

As a democracy we have decided that though our legislators cannot perhaps fill up tax forms but they can legislate and that, though they might have dozens of criminal charges against them, they can still enter the electoral fray.

 

But even as politicians in India have managed to tunnel their way into brutal ridicule one should bear in mind that the 11 MPs we have talked about in Operation Duryodhana don’t define the moral hollowness of Indian politics, we at least hope so, in the way that the Taliban doesn’t define Islam or Praveen Togadia, Hinduism.

 

For corruption to be defeated it has to be decoded first. Some would even say that while in the West one makes money in the market and uses it to buy or manipulate power, in India one grabs power in order to make money. The other thing about it that needs to be understood is that when powerful citizens are caught lunging for cash, they crank propaganda with ferocity. There is this demonic energy that propaganda generates which tricks you to try and understand an issue not on the facts but on the people who put those facts. It also tries to cloud the main issue with irrelevant, minor issues.

 

And even as I am calibrating my news radar on this unconfirmed tip off that has come to me, anonymously, about these celebrities who are clandestinely involved in the penile enhancement business and who, as a sideshow, also participate in rituals that resemble the Naked Singing cult from Bhutan, where they shower their dollars on nude damsels, I am generous enough to pass on a story idea that I think lots of Indian media houses should be pursuing. I have a hunch that an investigation into the MPLAD scheme would yield rich dividends.

 

(The writer headed the COBRAPOST investigation called Operation Duryodhana. The story, which broke in AAJ TAK, was co-authored by SUHASINI RAJ. The investigation was also assisted by KUMAR BAADAL.)

 

                                                                       Also read

          How it began | The Middlemen